Double Sessions?

Are two always better than one? I have subs and slaves that love double sessions. I also have them who say they can't stay in subspace with more than one Domme. Lack of intimacy during multiple Mistress sessions is also a common complaint.

I've had several double sessions that were fantastic and a couple that were just so-so. I think the key is when two Mistresses work well together and "feed" off each other. Another set up was to have one Mistress start the session and do the first hour. A second would join her and they'd both work me over for the next hour. Then one would leave the other to "finish me off" for the last hour.

I had a handful of double sessions - maybe four... five - over they years. But they were all with trainees and I was requested/ordered to do so by Mistresses I knew. I was complimented they selected me, all the sessions amounted to half with the Mistress & trainee, with the second half being "finished off" by the Mistress alone. And in all of the sessions I didn't pay extra, a perk for me/doing the Mistress a favor, take your pick. The second half of all those sessions were the best.

The only double session I planned and paid to do was a fetish/vanilla scene with my Mistress commenting on my performance with our guest and her. The vibe was off and, while I may be an exhibitionist, I like it best just one on one with the Mistress. As the old line goes, "Two's company, three's a crowd."

x I am going to separate out sessions involving trainees. I expressed my opinion about those in another recent thread.

As for true double Domme sessions my experience has been mixed. Where the two ladies don't get along it can be awful. Then there was the time where more than once I heard

"What do you want to do next?"

"I don't know. What do you want to do?"

"I don't know. What do you want to do?"

There have been times that it worked very well but it was never so sublime that it became my preferred type of session. I have a theory that subs who get intensely turned on by double sessions harbor strong two girl vanilla fantasies in addition to kink. I don't have those.

One thing that does work rather well in double sessions is when one of the ladies uses her body to restrain me while the other administers harsh corporal punishment.

I am afraid I am in the common category wanting intimacy. A menage a trois does not tell me much. The second mistress is a terzio incomod0.

I think it depends on 2 main things.
1 - the chemistry between the 2 Dommes
2 - the chemistry you have with the "lead" Domme.

I've had several double sessions, and only 2 have really been great experiences, and it was all about the chemistry the 2 had, and the trust I had in lead Domme.

I agree completely. I've had a great time doing doubles with my dominant TS girlfriend. I've had several so-so sessions with so-so Dommes. Unfortunately I've had a few one-offs with unimaginative power craving harpies, that made a 1 hour session seem like an overnight.

Great topic. I agree with the consensus here. When the chemistry is right, a double session is a great experience for all involved. I've found that when role play is involved, double sessions really rock. One of my clients loved 2 hour spy role play scenarios with two doms. I usually didn't accept scripted sessions. But, his requests were so much fun that I couldn't turn them down. Jean Bardot and I had a blast with this client whenever she was in town. Chemistry between everyone was key. Without that, it would have been as much fun as a wet blanket.

While the idea of a double interests me I agree with Nomasks on this. I think when it comes down to it I'd rather put the additional funds towards an longer session a well established Domme offering a extensive facility with tons of gear.

I like the intimacy of a one on one. For the extra money, I'd prefer to use it toward my next session.

Great topic. Im with many others here. Im looking for the intimacy and the emotional connection that a 1:1 session brings.

A few times Over the years ive been asked if i wanted a double session and have always turned it down. I also dont have any fantasies around this for vanilla sex so that could explain some of it.

Good topic. I think doubles are a different animal all together. Solo sessions provide that calm and connection to reach transcendence. Doubles are more fantasy filled fun. I also agree with what others have said about chemistry. It's usually a good idea to let the lead Domme pick the second, especially if she knows you and your mindset.

There are so many factors. Financial: If you were doing double sessions, would you do as many regular sessions? Focus: If you are focused on yourself it can be more fun, more things happening to you. If you are focused on the mistress either you don't get enough of her, in an unbalanced session, or you might think you are missing on both if the session is balanced. Which is why I think if you do a double session you should record it as well.

I've never pushed for any particular type of session. Men seem to pace themselves with what they want and can afford. Mistress Ayn summed up my preferences in double verses single sessions. It depends on the type of play and the chemistry with the players involved. :-)

Another factor I was not particularly eager to mention is age. I was much more into it when I was younger.

It is funny how that goes. My late husband was a good bit older than me. It hit a few years where he lost all interest in participating in session related activities. Then, one day, he was all about it again as if he was 23 years old. I'm sure it is different for everyone.

You would not believe how naive I was at 23. Not to mention in a country with zero access not only to BDSM but even to porn. Even when I came here I had no idea that this was something you could do in real life until I saw Fetishes. I started too late to have time to lose interest.