When a Domme Shows Skin

When I session, it is all about the Domme. It is arousing to submit to a beautiful lady who is showing off a heavenly body that I know is off limits to touch. The casual nudity on her part is a turn on. Is she teasing me or is simply unaware of her beauty? I took a Domme to Key West a few years ago. She causally changed her clothes in front of me. It was humbling. It put me in complete slave mode to know that she didn't even consider I would make an advance. I can see naked women any time I want. It was the head game, intentional or not, that had me going. Nudity, on my Domme's part, is not something I would request. It doesn't matter if it happens at all. It usually doesn't. But, it is an unexpected head trip when it does.

Interesting. It's just the opposite for me. Fetish wear that covers is far more of a turn on. I when a Domme is covered and her charms, while hinted at, are off limits. Something like a catsuit with gloves and boots makes me weak in the knees.

Don't get me wrong. I like it all. Nudity is not something I would ask for. It is the attitude about it gets me going on the rare occasion that it happens. It is as if I'm incidental. Catsuits and boots are hot too.

When I am bottoming to a woman, I roll with the flow. Once I submit to a top that I trust, it is Her scene. Nudity can be powerful with the right attitude. With the right top, so could almost any type of attire.

I would not have felt comfortable doing sessions nude or even partially so. But, everyone has a different style. ClubDom has shot videos in which women are showing their lady parts while wearing boots and fetish gear. With the right ladies and the right scene, it is a hot and powerful look. But, nudity for the sake of a peep show...nah. That would be a turn off. I like that you are so flexible in going with the wave your mistress wants to ride. It makes for a better session.

I might be one who paid closer attention to Club Dom than most. Besides if I have any interest in a mistress I try to see her evolution in time from all the sources I get. Also becoming a mistress is a process that takes time and many start as models.

After this long preamble I can say that my impression was that many mistresses in training so to say (I am aware it was not a dungeon) started more as second in session at Club Dom, more like eye candy.

Some of them turned in accomplished mistresses. For instance my impression was that Megan had at some point all the skills of a mistress but was still considered a model.

On the other side Esmi played in so many videos that she did acquire skills but probably considered porn more financially rewarding than BDSM.

You are spot on. We've shot with a lot of already established and amazing doms. But, some began as models. It was fun to see the light in their eyes as they fell in love with femdom and came into their own. Megan, to this day, is a close friend. She and her family often spend holidays with mine. She was a natural. Esmi, I totally loved. She was such a dollbaby who loved everything kink. She was eager to learn. She moved to California some years ago and we lost touch. I hope she is doing well.

Bart, of Siren Productions, is standing in for ClubDom's production manger for a little while. This weekend he is filming Goddess Rainy. I met Rainy last summer when Bart and friends came for a visit at my lake house. Rainy is so cool. She is really rocking it with sessions. She is somewhat new to filming. My bet is that she will be a natural. Mistress Alana will be filming with them. You may remember her from her and Deanna Storms epic outdoor shoots. Another one of Bart's friend who came to visit is young, beautiful and loves kink. I was completely charmed with her. I am not sure what name she will be filming under. Bart and I have very different ways when it comes to camera work. But, we are totally on par with awesome people and enjoyment of femdom. I'm hoping the shoots we'll be doing together over the next few months will turn out footage that is amazing as the fun everyone will be having on set.

I 100% pick up what you're saying -- she's casually naked, and whether it's a conscious tease, or that she's so above you that she doesn't care (the way you don't mind going to the bathroom in front of your puppy, say), it's a rush. Ironically, I also get the opposite rush: she's dressed, I'm naked, what a fun emphasis on the power dynamics.

Where I diverge from you is that I strongly prefer to see my domme naked, and always ask for it. Of course, this is pro domination so there's ways to communicate limits, so I frame it as an interest thing, something along the lines of: "I welcome you to disrobe to the most you are comfortable with. 100% your choice and no expectations from me, but you are definitely free to get as naked as you'd like or stay as dressed as you'd like."

Not all subs welcome a pro domme to get naked, or want the opportunity to touch her, or to orgasm. As a result, my philosophy is, if I'd like any of those things, I should clearly express them -- as respectfully stated interests, not demands. The first two I just express as being 100% her choice and I'm just inviting her to explore to whatever extent she'd like; the last (me orgasming) is a requirement and I'd not take a session with a pro domme who denied it.

To reply to myself! I should add that obviously, if a domme's profile says she doesn't work naked, I wouldn't ask for it. I'm not a boundary pusher, but if there's ambiguity, I bias towards letting the domme know what I prefer, but recognize that she is the final decision maker

Thanks for your response. I saw your other one too. I am of the same mind that I would never ask for it, especially if it is listed as one of her restrictions. If a Domme offered it for additional money, it would be a turn off. It is the whole unexpected head fuck when it occurs that gets me going.

I was aware of Bart, but discovered his studio only about a year ago. I think that as usual you made such a good choice. I was thinking of him as of a natural descender of Club Dom even before I knew of this association.

Bart and I met about 20 years ago when I was in LA filming for Gwen Media and visiting Isabella Sinclair. We've worked together on and off since then. He's one of the most pure of heart, easy going, fun loving people I know. Everyone loves Bart. Our shooting styles are different. While I don't see Bart taking over as production manager for ClubDom, it is likely that we'll keep working together on occasion. At least, I certainly hope so.

I wasn't going to touch this subject, because I might get too blunt, but it's a rainy Sunday, I'm feeling my age today, so what the hell. My first response comes from an uncle of mine who I once heard talk about nudity in the movies during the 1960s when I was in my early teens. "A woman is more seductive, more mysterious when she's wearing lingerie than being nude."

Intellectually I've always agreed, especially in the context of BDSM sessions where Mistresses wear sexy and revealing outfits. But in session during peak arousal when Mistresses I knew went partially nude, or if I were really blessed, allowed some intimate body worship I was all for it. And I can honestly say I never remember blantantly asking after I knew the rules.

Some of the sexiest and seductive Mistresses I have served never went nude. Some have peeled something off, knowing I was being driven wild. Here were two rather weird occurances for me. One was with a very dominant bodybuilder I served for several years. She let me worship her intimately after I endured her scissoring and light corporal. We even did some public play in a parking lot, in hotel stairways. She never went topless and never made any attempt to manually, or any other way, bring me to orgasm. I never asked. Those were unstated rules of engagement with her.

Another Mistress was rather gothic, always wore a black corset of some type with her breasts straining to escape. And she always wore panty hose. (Yes, it was in the 1980s.) She really had a hynotic stare, the scenes we did were always seduction, light corporal with me being an exhibitionist for her. She went topless once ("look but don't touch") and to this day I hate stockings or panty hose of any type on women. Scarred for life, I guess. LOL.

My time doing sessions has shown to me the wide variety of ways arousal can occur... at least for me.

Interesting to know. So I guess Michele has the Club Dom real estate while you hold on to the intellectual property. I am a little puzzled because what I saw in the last few years did not feel like your touch.

It would be nice to see new productions made by you. Probably more difficult today because having a big budget helps when you fly and bring in together people from different parts of the country.

However creativity and good taste still rule, and there were some very good clips in the early days before Club Dom was such a big success.

Michelle bought the house from me, although we worked things out in a way that we could both utilize the property. Although we shot ClubDom there for years, I never saw the property and website as being closely tied together. We've had several locations over the years. I recently purchased acreage close to the Tennessee/North Carolina border. I will be building out a studio for video production this spring. Michelle will be free to use it for events should she continue to have them after she sells the previous ClubDom property.

I'm curious as to what you saw change over the last few years in regard to style. We've had to make numerous adjustments in regard to shooting for various reasons. Thanks for your input on this subject. It is helpful.