Lexx Envy

I have removed The Dominatrix's legal name. Domina.Ms will not tolerate the use of Mistress's legal names.



Psychologist's Lawsuit Against Dominatrix, 'Slave' Ends in $5M Verdict
P.J. D'Annunzio
May 13, 2021

A psychologist, a dominatrix and her “slave” walk into a courtroom. The punchline? A $5 million verdict in the related defamation lawsuit.

The verdict comes from the case of psychologist and human resources company CEO Gary Dumais, who sued defendants Jeffrey Roberts and a woman Roberts paid to boss him around, allegedly ordering him to defame Dumais, her ex, according to court papers.

Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Susan Schulman entered the verdict against only. According to Dumais’ lawyer, David Heim of Bochetto & Lentz, whose professional name is Lexx Envy—refused to participate in the case after making her initial appearance.

Roberts settled with Dumais before trial. That agreement, for a undisclosed amount, settles allegations that Roberts posted anonymous comments online calling Dumais a “rapist,” “alcoholic” and “drug addict,” which Dumais alleged caused him to lose tens of thousands of dollars in business.

“Roberts admits that was his personal dominatrix and he was her ‘slave” during the relevant time. Roberts also admits that as ‘slave’ he was required to do everything she told him,” the plaintiff’s pretrial memorandum said.

“Clearly, Roberts—as ‘slave’ who is duty bound to do her bidding—was conspiring with her to get retribution against Mr. Dumais because several years earlier Dumais had a brief romantic relationship which Mr. Dumais ended when he learned she was dangerous and potentially psychotic,” court papers said.

In his court papers, Roberts pointed to a cross-claim he filed.

“Roberts denies that he had any involvement in the conduct alleged by Dumais,” his court papers said. “Roberts has also filed a cross-claim against alleging that—if any actionable conduct occurred was solely responsible for it. filed an answer admitting that she is liable under Roberts’ cross-claim.”

The papers continued, “The reason that Dumais has sued Roberts is that some of the allegedly defamatory statements were connected to the internet protocol (‘IP’) address allocated to Roberts’ residence. However, and Roberts agree that: (1) was at Roberts’ residence at the time that the statements were published; (2) she used Roberts’ Wi-Fi connection to publish the statements; (3) Roberts was asleep at the time; and (4) Roberts had absolutely no involvement or knowledge about what was doing.”

Roberts’ lawyer, Jonathan Cohen of Conrad O’Brien, did not respond to a request for comment. could not be reached for comment.

“This award shows how damaging internet defamation can be to a person and a business, particularly the court’s award of $3 million in reputation damages,” Heim said. “Our client was victimized by someone with bad intentions to ruin him. We had no idea who was doing it as the defendant acted anonymously and actively concealed her identity. But Gary stood up for himself and fought back to regain his reputation. I really admire him for it.”

https://www.law.com/thelegalintelligence...s-in-5m-verdict

Looking forward to scheduling a session with Lexx now that her legal troubles are settled.

This may end up being a theme of one of the Law and Order type shows.

Has anyone had a good experience with her over the years?

If you look her up you'll see she moved and is harassing people in other cities. Others report she's changed her name and appearance.

She's to be avoided.

Interesting post, and I agree real life harassment is not an acceptable derivative of play.

My question is procedural. Where does the red exclamation mark next to the title comes from and what does it mean?

I agree that many posts describe her in a poor light, almost certainly her own doing. My question still stands. Over the years, has anyone had a good session with Lexx Envy?

She has ruthlessly defamed several good people, good dommes. I don't understand why a good session matters.

Are you aware that she has attacked dommes for years now? If you were I don't think you would compare it to a derivative of play. What I've seen other dommes say about her it is reaaly a sad situation for them.

The exclamation is just to bring attention to the post.

Never heard of her so I have no idea. Thanks for the explanation for the mark. Although I guess that all of us when we start a new post find the subject interesting and want to bring attention to it, otherwise we would not start it.

I'll be more clear. She's a danger to people so I felt that I wanted to get that across. The red exclamation seemed to work for this purpose.

A domme I very much like has been one of her victims. This domme shared with me the extent of her attacks and suggested I stay away from her. I'm thankful she cared about my safety because I'd considered a session and Lexx Envy has attacked some of her own subs. She is a very disturbed individual.

I appreciate your intentions with this post. But, I need to ask you to redact actual, legal names.

That link takes you to Law.com the source of this article. Her name is included there because its public information since she committed a crime and was involved in a lawsuit, which she was found guilty. If you're concerned about protecting her you may need to take that up with the court.

My question has nothing to do with her negative history. Again, it has nothing to do with it. Now that we got that out of the way, here is my question that has not yet been answered - and again has NOTHING to do with her reputation.

Has anyone, in the history of the world, had a positive session experience with Lexx Envy - despite her negative reputation?

You're a peach, Ropelust58.

Everyone, note that Ropelust58 registered on 9/18/21, most likely only to post about this topic.

I created an account here many years ago but was unable to log in. So yes I had to create another. I wanted to pass along this information after my domme informed me of the outcome of this lawsuit. I'm here to help. If you don't want the help you are free to read something else.

Blah blah blah. Apparently, you snacked on lead paint chips as a child.

I will send you a PM. You are misunderstanding that this is not personal. It has been tradition with forums of this nature, staring with MF two decades ago, that links to real names violate TOS. It would be great if you changed the copy and paste to redact not only her real name but that of the men involved. I didn't make this rule. Thanks, in advance, for understanding.

It is nice to see people still caring about good old standards. I had a similar fight a few years ago at MF. It worked originally then the story grew, and people didn't care.