Something Weird Stories

When I was first starting out in 2006 at Rebecca's Hidden Chamber, a way for them to gauge whether you would last is if you could endure sessions with regular clients whose predilections were... unusual. There was a guy into having his teeth pulled (fine by me!), a guy who wanted you to watch him put his dick in a vacuum hose (no judgment), a guy who wanted a stiletto in his urethra (uhhh... he seems to really enjoy it), etc, etc. The list goes on.

One of the weirdest things I've ever seen and will never forget is a session with a cross dresser who said he wanted to give me a "show". What did I know, right? Oh! A show! Okay, she'll do a sexy dance, I'll slap her ass-- whatever. Well, after she picked out several outfits and decided on one (finally), she took out a Nerf football. Hmmm... I said, what do you use that for? She took the ball, bent over, and shoved the entire thing (quite easily, I might add) in her ass. She bent over on the floor and said, "You wanna see?!" Still very confused, enthusiastically I said, "Yes! Show me!" The football shot right out of her ass and hit the ceiling! I have never seen anything like that before or since.

That is my Something Weird story. If you have one, tell it below:)


xoxo.

Well that's good news. My friend... um... puture fet.... has been looking everywhere for my... for his - HIS nerf ball. If you could give it to me, I'll make sure he gets it back.

Wow, you and your friend have suspiciously similar names!

Unfortunately, I did not get to keep the football.

Yes, that is truly out there.

In my dotcom days I had a coworker who used to like to tell a story about a guy, Richard Hose, who embraced it and insisted on being called "Dick". Dick Hose.

I wonder ....

Mme Veronica, here's my weird story and it's about a Domina/bodybuilder.

She would travel to NYC once a year or, on business, I'd see her on the West Coast. I had sessions with her for five years until she retired. I helped her with her website a bit, we would exchange emails and talk regularly on the phone, and she was probably the most dominant Domina I've ever met. She got me into the deepest subspace.

We are the same age and about a year before she retired I had a session on the West Coast in my hotel room. It was the whole "Tarzan/Amazon Queen" thing with leg scissors, spanking and body worship. Specifically me being used to pleasure her orally. Well, at the middle of this particular session she said, "I want you to shave me." Shocked I said, "What?" And she ordered me to remove her thong. She had her razor and cream and said, "Do it." I stammered and said, "I've never done that before." She quietly, but firmly said to me, "I trust you."

I said, "Okay, but I'm going to do it like my Italian barber who has shaved my face." I got a hot towel, warmed the area, put on the cream and oh-so-carefully shaved her. Then I got another towel and cleaned or the excess cream, hair, etc. and patted her dry. She was pleased, content. And ordered me to pleasure her once again.

After she retired we spoke and I asked her why. She said, "I knew I was going to leave [the scene] and enter a long-term relationship, and this was the beginning of the transition."

Looking back I feel honored she trusted me. But at the time... I had no idea what was going on. I guess she was complimenting me in an unusual way.

I bet you were pondering if "this was the beginning of the transition", what was the next step in that direction.

LOL! The transition was really to move out of the scene (she did), get back to her own vanilla career (she did), and have a long term relationship with this guy (that ended rather quickly).

I knew these would go in a sexual direction.

You were very very lucky.


xoxo.

But of course, since males are involved. It is a true story. But as you can tell with many of my "adventures" I wasn't trained very well, from the beginning. Sure there was kink, spanking, light bondage, roleplay... but from the beginning there was always a "sexual direction." Sometimes I was a bystander. Other times I flirted and charmed my way into it. No matter the method or avenue, in your words I was "very, very lucky." LOL!

Be safe my friend.

I'm curious to know when exactly the Old Guard standards became relaxed and proDommes started having more intimate sessions... It is probably not a clearly cut timeline. It seems like the 70's things were more carefree and then in the 90's it became more common to model after the Old Guard. That is only based on what a few slaves have told me over the years.

In 2006 when I started at Rebecca's, there was definitely a push/pull of those willing to be more sexual and those who had stricter boundaries. The stricter people always looked down on the others. Which is of course, woman on woman sexism. I could see though, that the stricter people were there to do a certain thing and felt demoralized to work in a place where strict Domme/sub standards weren't adhered to. Sex positive third wave feminists who have gotten into the scene have done a lot to bridge the gap between the sex worker Dommes and those who do not identify as such.

As long as everyone is enjoying themselves, who cares right?


V

Mme Veronica, here’s my take since I sessioned with independent Dominas and Mistresses at dungeons, off and on, from the ‘70s into the 2000s.

The ‘70s were more sensual, at least for a college kid like me. Much more worship with Dominas who, let’s face it, were all older than me. A young guy could actually be a house slave, at a dungeon or a Mistresses’ apartment, and do chores for a short session. It was all a carryover of the “Swinging 60s” free love” mentality. By the time I came back in the mid-80s just about everyone was more strict with sensuality due to the HIV/AIDS crisis and more fears of a police crackdown in NY at least.

By the mid ‘90s, when I came back into the scene after leaving for a while, there was a split between old school Mistresses who would hold you off at arm’s length (literally and figuratively) and those who were more open to sensuality. When the Internet became the place in the late ‘90s, dungeon & domina sites, Max Fisch was created, all Mistresses were adamant in online and in print they provided legal services. (Behind closed doors, in some cases if a Domina knew you, things became more open.)

In the 2000s I began to session a bit more with female bodybuilders who were dominant. Some offered a “full menu” of dominant and sensual options. Some of the traditional Dominas could be very strict, and sensual, all at the same time. My last truly active period probably ended around 2010 and I’ve seen Mistresses (or bodybuilders) since then who know me.

Mme Veronica, as I posted before, for a strict Domina no matter the era I was a lousy sub. Hell, I’ll brag - polite, respectful and a gentleman - but someone who was giving plenty of “sensual privileges” along the way. That’s what I remember.

Be safe... everyone.

Crossing a boundary into sexual activity is a funny thing for me. My personal feeling towards Dommes that don't cross into the sexual realm because they are following rules laid down to them by someone else diminishes their dominance. This is a Stark contrast to those who don't do it because they don't feel like it or feel it is beneath them. Anyhow, I consider myself more of a kinkster so absolutely dominance isn't a deal breaker for me all the time with every session.

This! "As long as everyone is enjoying themselves, who cares right?" Exactly! What two (or more) people do together is between them and is no one else's business. THE END!

Absolutely!

Thanks for the breakdown!

I don't think being given privileges necessarily makes you a bad sub. It just means you weren't trained. But then, not everyone *can* be trained. Not everyone wants to be trained. I would put most fetishists in this category. One's fetish can make you have feelings of submission, but that is not the same as being a submissive.

Another weird story: Again, while working at Rebecca's (one of the best times of my life I have to say) there was a guy who would come in and want to see "busty" women. He did not want to touch them and he did not want anyone to take their shirt off- he just wanted you to talk about how big they were. How big they were, and how big they were going to get- like swallow your whole head kind of big. How they would float you away like huge balloons sort of big. One day I realized that it was not about breasts, but about the thought of them getting "bigger and bigger" (a phrase he loved).

He had a pneumatic fetish. It had nothing to do with the actual look or feel of the breasts themselves. Which I found charming and still do.


Best,


V

I know, right?

I think it is probably VERY common.

Well-- to each his own. Although many women do have dominant tendencies from birth, some do not but go on to enjoy being dominant and become quite good at it. "Born This Way" or not, you still have to apprentice to someone who teaches you how to be technically proficient. So... is that submissive? I don't think so. Does it follow that if you are taught BDSM - in practice, professionally- does not involve overt sexuality and you follow that rule, that you are submissive to that idea? I don't think that is necessarily so.


V

If you apprentice to someone and they teach you BDSM, they teach you knots and how to throw a whip, how to take care of your leather, not to cane the coccyx etc. But ultimately your style is your own. So you still have room to grow and change beyond your apprenticeship.

Now I would say that all dommes from the most sadistic to the most sensual do something sexual for us whether it is sexual or the traditional sense or sexual in our minds eye. It's up to the Domme to decide if she's ok with sexual and if shes not, what her line is. Everything I say here says more about my perception than the reality of the Domme.

And sorry for the stream of consciousness, my new schedule has me all over the place.

It is pretty moot to talk about what is sexual and what is not, especially here. Everyone has different boundaries, but I think in essence what we're getting to here is a discussion about what behaviors are "truly dominant" and what are not. I think this is equally subjective and hence, equally moot, as every submissive has their own feelings about what is dominant behavior.


xoxo.