Visual Motivation

With all the nudity, twerking, and overtly sexual content posted on twitter, do you expect these behaviors during sessions?

Does it make you want to schedule sessions with Mistresses who choose to show, and do more?

Do you find these tweets visually motivating, or are you repulsed by them?

I enjoy the visual stuff on Twitter. Some of it is tasteless.

If all I wanted to see was some skin there are easier ways to do that.

I like the full deal when I session. The psychology, the experience, the rules, protocols, submission.

I would have no expectation that a professional Domme would twerk or session naked. I have been with a few who chose to show more, but it was always there choice to do so and it was a complete surprise to me. Those occasions were also definitely the exception to the rule.

Perhaps I have been very fortunate in that most of the many Dommes that I have sessioned with have been very professional, smart and classy women. I couldn't in my wildest dreams ever picture one twerking for my visual enjoyment, not even in a T&D session.

For me, visual motivation is thigh high leather boots and a leather cat suit or corset. If not boots then killer stilettoes and some sexy garters and stockings. Greatest visual stimulation is seeing "that look" in her eyes!

Stay your classy self, Ms. Rose!

Thanks for the responses.

What do you believe the influence of twitter and it's thousands of so-called Dommes, be on Pro Domination as a whole?

More business, but aside from that it is probably making things worse. Findommes, more visibility to people who would want to attack it legally.,

As someone who loves as much sexuality mixed into his femdom as possible, as a general rule, I love the overtly sexual femdom content. Obviously, there are ways to turn me off -- for example, I find twerking coarse and vulgar, and often a turn-off. But by and large, I very much enjoy nudity. If the visuals press all the right buttons, I absolutely am more likely to contact her



I understand that the internet and live sessions are completely different media, governed by different norms, laws, and ethics. No, I don't expect those behaviors in sessions. But I don't NOT expect those behaviors either, or at least, if she doesn't specifically mention them on her website (e.g., "I am never nude in live sessions"), I might inquire... Sometimes, I leave it as vague as, "I loved what you did in XYZ clip/insta/tweet/snap. If you are comfortable doing that in session, I'd love it... don't tell me the answer either way, I'd rather it be a surprise."

No I’ve never session with those type of pro Domme and wouldn’t want too either. I suspect they marketed toward a different type of clients too.

I haven't seen any dommes I've been interested in twerking on their Twitter, but overtly sexual content certainly doesn't turn me away from sessioning with a domme, but it also isn't top 3 in what influences my decision to session with a domme.

Never... Just because a Domme does something on camera that doesn't mean it is available to me in a session. I also never expect that if a Domme decides to do something in a session with me this time, it translates into her doing that in any future session.



All other things being equal (which they never are), my answer world be yes... I prefer Dommes who are less uptight about sex and play so if someone is more sexual in their posts, it is an indicator that they probably are a better match.



Depends on the specific content, but more likely to be visually motivating... I am much more repulsed by money-grubbing pics or the general attitudes and statements by some Dommes (most of which they don't actually believe in my experience) than any pictures they post that is sexual in nature.

Ms Rose Woods,

I typically, and very much appreciate, when They are "being Themselves" as much as possible, because I find authenticity, even when it is a bit off the wall/crazy to be very alluring. Fakeness really puts me off.

As for the above actions, both in session and out. I absolutely think each Domme should decide for Herself and I strongly feel that I am the last person that should judge someone arbitrarily.

I bet there could be bdsm/fetish bizzaro world scenarios out there where even "twerking" would fit in somehow.... lol

po

I occasionally get requests for nudity and practices I do not do, but these things can be more common here in Europe. I don't look down on these dommes at all. I am not compatible with these clients and when I explain that what they are seeking can be found for less expense, usually everyone ends up happy. Just because I provide a different experience, doesn't mean those other services and desires aren't valid. I have my niche and I am staying right in it.

I don't think it is Twitter per se. Perhaps it is because Twitter is a place where everyone is all lumped together. Since I started as a domme, I have always had to advertise along with escorts, which has lead me to screen my clients a certain way.

I have much more requests for elaborate, and very expensive, leather and latex ensembles. I am okay with that.

I know Dommes who are very careful about doing anything on camera that they won't do in session.

My mentor always said "If a sub sees me bungee jumping off the Bloukrans Bridge, he's got the right to believe I'm a bungee jumper!"

Agreed. I won't do a clip that is not something I do in session.

Clips are also a form of advertising.

I totally agree with both of you about the expectations it sets for a lot of guys... I was answering the question solely for myself and my own expectations.

So true why put something out there you don’t offer in a session. I’ve seen some Dommes say some of the things they do with video subs for C4S they don’t offer in a session as well.

I'm the same way. I can't see the benefit of being asked 3000 times if I'll compromise my beliefs for a few extra dollars.

Men develop fantasies based on what they see. Clips are advertising. I've got clients who come to me due to my corporal punishment clips.

https://xfantasy.tv/video/5ca03f9148d6d95975b41f68

For me, those aren't things I look for.
Obviously a stunning Domme is incredible, but "twerking" and outwardly sexual isn't really a draw for sessions.

I'm more more attracted to the power and control, superiority and to me, twerking and overtly sexual don't command that level of power that I prefer to see.

Seeing Mistresses like those in Atlanta "twerk" isn't needed...They'll twerk ya, just other ways.

Great question, as I do feel that some of the internet Dommes have made it more difficult for Serious Pro Dommes, as well as for subs by putting so much "fake" content and stuff that gets a quick blink, vs true Dommes, and I also suspect it's exposed real Dommes to some unwanted interactions and scrutiny that does none of us any good.

Good day,

Ah, the dreaded Twitter question . . . Hello Ms. Rose Woods.
Obviously there are all kinds of people on Twitter that are part of the adult industry. I think it's in vogue right now to call yourself a Dominatrix. Most of the findoms are simply cam girls that have found a new, easier way to earn money. Calling themselves a Mistress or a Domme adds to their mystique I suppose.

Unfortunately some ladies that do in person sessions are starting to emulate this behavior. I think part of that is the desire to chase every possible income stream. Fans Only, NiteFlirt, cam sessions, FinDom, clips, etc. and they use these provocative approaches to try and snare clients. Unfortunately it falls flat with a lot of subs (as is evident in many of the responses here). I film as part of my overall market strategy, so I only do things and dress in films like I would in an in person session. The amount of money made from clips is a drop in the bucket compared to live sessions and if I didn't think it helped me book more sessions or elevate my brand, I wouldn't do it. I think many of the Twitter ladies you are talking about don't get this concept and think all of the twerking, nudity, etc. brings in more business. A big part of domination is about the tease and lack of access. It is not a concept that everyone gets.

I wish Cheyenne would jump into this question because a lot of what you see on ClubDom falls into this category.

Dommes can become bigger names by doing more sexually explicit material in clips. Showing your boobs, appearing nude or doing kink porn can mean a larger payday and more exposure on a major site (well... Guaranteed there is more exposure at least ).

It also may be a reflection of what they do in real life within a committed lifestyle relationship (in many cases, that is who is the suv in more graphic scenes) since they are more than just Pro Dommes. We sometimes forget that we in the Pro/client community are a subculture of a subculture and don't actually reflect the majority of people within the kink community.

There is also the idea (mustaken in my opinion) that guys who want to book with them understand the difference between reality and what they do on camera for fantasy purposes. Those of us on this board get that difference. Random horny guys looking at Twitter and not thinking there is a difference between an escort and a Pro Domme just don't and Ptos who do it have to deal with those idiots.

We also understand how many amazing Pro Dommes actually got their start as rope bunnies for pictures and clips. Doesn't mean they are any less or more dominant, it was just a different path... But, I guarantee you asking Kendra James, Carissa Montgomery or Julie Simone (among many others) to allow you to tie them up in a Pro Domme session because you saw them in clips and pics will not be well received but it is what made them famous to begin with.

So, I think the answer comes down to this... Real Dommes do what they wish regardless of what anyone else's opinion is and sometimes those choices don't make sense to anyone else (or even to them afterwards).

Cheyenne would be perfect to answer this topic. If I do remember the Cheyenne did explain once on the Hang about her video slaves and women she hires for Clubdom.

I’ve never session with anyone topless and prefer not but it’s to each own. I’m guessing if these women feel like they can get more clients that way more power to it. Of course once new subs they starting seeing those Dommes they think a big name Domme will too.

I've never made any kind of wardrobe requests of a Domme and I certainly would never ask, let alone expect, a Domme to take off her top during a session... But, I have had many Dommes decide to take off their top during a session for their own reasons or as part of some play scenario they wanted to do with me (just like I have seen many vaginas because a Domme decided to give me me a shower).

I don't think it is a big deal as long as they are in charge rather than giving in to someone topping from the bottom... it's also not a majority of Dommes I have seen or even what a particular Domme does in every session (with a few exceptions).. finally, there is no direct correlation between those I have seen do so on camera and those who have done it within a session with me (in fact, it is just the opposite as I am more likely to see the breasts of someone who would never show them on camera than someone who has and now has to deal with idiots expecting that).

I like big butts, but I do not like twerking. It looks low rent.

Thanks for the comments everyone. I don't believe we've discussed the effects of social media on Dommes, and Pro Domination to it's fullest. I'll be posting on this topic soon.