|
|
#18096 - 11/12/22 09:27 PM
Should we only see dommes who have a blue check on Twitter for safety purposes?
|
Member
Registered: 11/09/22
Posts: 9
|
Since we have to supply references and deposits, should things get balanced out with dommes becoming blue check Twitter verified now that the feature is open to everyone? I know I would feel much safer sessioning with someone who has been verified.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18098 - 11/13/22 06:59 AM
Re: Should we only see dommes who have a blue check on Twitter for safety purposes?
[Re: VaxxedToTheMaxx]
|
Regular
Registered: 07/09/19
Posts: 165
|
I see two well known and reputable Dommes who have active twitter accounts. Neither has a blue check mark.
Blue check marks mean nothing, at least right now.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18100 - 11/13/22 02:42 PM
Re: Should we only see dommes who have a blue check on Twitter for safety purposes?
[Re: VaxxedToTheMaxx]
|
Sage
Registered: 07/08/16
Posts: 1073
Loc: Detroit
|
Since we have to supply references and deposits, should things get balanced out with dommes becoming blue check Twitter verified now that the feature is open to everyone? I know I would feel much safer sessioning with someone who has been verified. The reason for references is because very few of us as clients have well-known presences within the scene or on the internet. There are not review boards for clients other than blacklists for those that are dangerous. Deposits are a different question as those are in place to help mitigate if/when a client doesn't show up for some reason (legitimate or not) since Dommes must prepare for a session in various ways (hair/makeup, getting dressed up, possibly travel and facility fees) that they totally lose out on if the session doesn't happen. There is no client equivalent for this. A blue checkmark means Twitter knows their legal identity. Eros has the same thing. It has nothing to do with whether someone is trustworthy or has any clue what they are doing from either a safety or fun perspective. So, while I support your personal decision of setting that as a requirement for you to book, I don't see much value in it as I trust my own research a hell of a lot more than Twitter's. YMMV...
_________________________
Asp
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18112 - 11/14/22 03:16 PM
Re: well well well
[Re: VaxxedToTheMaxx]
|
Sage
Registered: 11/02/15
Posts: 838
Loc: Philadelphia
|
Since we have to supply references and deposits, should things get balanced out with dommes becoming blue check Twitter verified now that the feature is open to everyone? I know I would feel much safer sessioning with someone who has been verified. VaxxedToTheMaxx, aka BootyWarrior, aka NoMasks: I know that antagonizing Dommes is one of your kinks, but keep it up and you will be removed. Again.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18113 - 11/14/22 03:18 PM
Re: Should we only see dommes who have a blue check on Twitter for safety purposes?
[Re: AspX]
|
Sage
Registered: 11/02/15
Posts: 838
Loc: Philadelphia
|
The reason for references is because very few of us as clients have well-known presences within the scene or on the internet. There are not review boards for clients other than blacklists for those that are dangerous. Deposits are a different question as those are in place to help mitigate if/when a client doesn't show up for some reason (legitimate or not) since Dommes must prepare for a session in various ways (hair/makeup, getting dressed up, possibly travel and facility fees) that they totally lose out on if the session doesn't happen. There is no client equivalent for this.
A blue checkmark means Twitter knows their legal identity. Eros has the same thing. It has nothing to do with whether someone is trustworthy or has any clue what they are doing from either a safety or fun perspective. So, while I support your personal decision of setting that as a requirement for you to book, I don't see much value in it as I trust my own research a hell of a lot more than Twitter's.
YMMV... It's kind of you to explain this to our intellectually challenged troll.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18118 - 11/14/22 04:29 PM
Re: Should we only see dommes who have a blue check on Twitter for safety purposes?
[Re: Mistress Tissa]
|
Member
Registered: 11/09/22
Posts: 9
|
The reason for references is because very few of us as clients have well-known presences within the scene or on the internet. There are not review boards for clients other than blacklists for those that are dangerous. Deposits are a different question as those are in place to help mitigate if/when a client doesn't show up for some reason (legitimate or not) since Dommes must prepare for a session in various ways (hair/makeup, getting dressed up, possibly travel and facility fees) that they totally lose out on if the session doesn't happen. There is no client equivalent for this.
A blue checkmark means Twitter knows their legal identity. Eros has the same thing. It has nothing to do with whether someone is trustworthy or has any clue what they are doing from either a safety or fun perspective. So, while I support your personal decision of setting that as a requirement for you to book, I don't see much value in it as I trust my own research a hell of a lot more than Twitter's.
YMMV... It's kind of you to explain this to our intellectually challenged troll. ^Twitter would consider this hate speech
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18119 - 11/14/22 04:32 PM
Re: well well well
[Re: Mistress Tissa]
|
Member
Registered: 11/09/22
Posts: 9
|
Mistress Tissa,
Thank you for commenting. I just joined here because Maxfisch seemed toxic, even if it does have nearly five times the activity this site does, this just seemed like a safer space, but you are not making me feel welcome here with tossing around random names and insinuations.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18120 - 11/14/22 04:36 PM
Re: well well well
[Re: VaxxedToTheMaxx]
|
Sage
Registered: 11/02/15
Posts: 838
Loc: Philadelphia
|
Mistress Tissa,
Thank you for commenting. I just joined here because Maxfisch seemed toxic, even if it does have nearly five times the activity this site does, this just seemed like a safer space, but you are not making me feel welcome here with tossing around random names and insinuations. You like to play victim when you are the instigator.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#18121 - 11/14/22 05:06 PM
Re: well well well
[Re: Mistress Tissa]
|
Member
Registered: 11/09/22
Posts: 9
|
How would an in-person session between you and I go? Would you gaslight me like you are doing now? Beat me senseless? Or deliver one of the best sessions ever and convert me into a devoted follower?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
143 registered (Jimmysam, WestAugust, Superkings, Mistrix Violeta, marstoy, TheLadyMichelle, langerr, ztrade, Aztoilet, GoddessCapri, TheDriver, ElenaDeLuca, Bruce88, Kevin, Chuck123, Chi61, Lady Velvet Steel, midlet, The Thomas, nysubjack, Soapy, denali, DominaAdmin, Mistress UV, Domina M, Slv4u, tosser, junglebeast, DommeLynx, artiemus1, furfan, Boucheron, PASubMale, Crytears, Scs202323, uno, cbtlover, CelesteTaylor, Cargill22, gilcarnovsky, MayaMidnight, MsRoseWoods, EvedLeNashim, subhuman7, Gagged2, Sublime2199, subtember, Curiouser, jadreg13, matthew, buffalo, stoney, Chaos, Lady Bellatrix, Jimjames, international, NaughtyNickB, Jaynorthshore, Ivo73, Dr. Pleasure, Marcus, T-bone, Ms_Gia_Peccato, Stern Miss Lea, Mistress Mickey, SlaveGunner, Quietguy1583, shanghaimistress, ChicagoSlicker, Mick681, tophumiliatrix, Mistress Berlin NYC, sfotk1, Poester, slvmaximus, palmer, isuffr4her, forHer, Mistress Trinity, Gjspinster4, Stephen M, Thimble, Mistress Tissa, HOMlover, frank, Subsouth304, Lady Paradise, Abercrombie, Gawarest, Harrison, pavium, dikembe50, Mistress Aurianna, George brown, Alpha Selena, picaro, Rijd, MistressMaraM, Browniepoints95, DeanChase, Oliver Cromwell, Queen Naomi, Trapper, sg22, Chamberpot, BellBoy, Jupiter Lake, Dannysub, Bound ashtray Man, Trbh9021, Mistress Ayn, fetishfan4, Punkeyeb, SamBorn, kefxb24, SlutTatiana, AaronGrant, Sissymaddy, Ms Regan Black, Mistress An Li, Baba-yaga, FilmSlave, Paul Thompson, AssSniffer1999, subspace, PNWSub, KinkyBoston, Johnd3033, truesubtipp, Arnold, Miss Nyxon, Loves OTK, So long, sellinggr, Mistress Lisa, JosephG, doglette, tylerr, broom, betadog, disposable?, Violetwand, slv3),
11836
Guests and
84
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index