Are two always better than one? I have subs and slaves that love double sessions. I also have them who say they can't stay in subspace with more than one Domme. Lack of intimacy during multiple Mistress sessions is also a common complaint.

I've had several double sessions that were fantastic and a couple that were just so-so. I think the key is when two Mistresses work well together and "feed" off each other. Another set up was to have one Mistress start the session and do the first hour. A second would join her and they'd both work me over for the next hour. Then one would leave the other to "finish me off" for the last hour.

I had a handful of double sessions - maybe four... five - over they years. But they were all with trainees and I was requested/ordered to do so by Mistresses I knew. I was complimented they selected me, all the sessions amounted to half with the Mistress & trainee, with the second half being "finished off" by the Mistress alone. And in all of the sessions I didn't pay extra, a perk for me/doing the Mistress a favor, take your pick. The second half of all those sessions were the best.

The only double session I planned and paid to do was a fetish/vanilla scene with my Mistress commenting on my performance with our guest and her. The vibe was off and, while I may be an exhibitionist, I like it best just one on one with the Mistress. As the old line goes, "Two's company, three's a crowd."

x I am going to separate out sessions involving trainees. I expressed my opinion about those in another recent thread.

As for true double Domme sessions my experience has been mixed. Where the two ladies don't get along it can be awful. Then there was the time where more than once I heard

"What do you want to do next?"

"I don't know. What do you want to do?"

"I don't know. What do you want to do?"

There have been times that it worked very well but it was never so sublime that it became my preferred type of session. I have a theory that subs who get intensely turned on by double sessions harbor strong two girl vanilla fantasies in addition to kink. I don't have those.

One thing that does work rather well in double sessions is when one of the ladies uses her body to restrain me while the other administers harsh corporal punishment.

I am afraid I am in the common category wanting intimacy. A menage a trois does not tell me much. The second mistress is a terzio incomod0.

I think it depends on 2 main things.
1 - the chemistry between the 2 Dommes
2 - the chemistry you have with the "lead" Domme.

I've had several double sessions, and only 2 have really been great experiences, and it was all about the chemistry the 2 had, and the trust I had in lead Domme.

I agree completely. I've had a great time doing doubles with my dominant TS girlfriend. I've had several so-so sessions with so-so Dommes. Unfortunately I've had a few one-offs with unimaginative power craving harpies, that made a 1 hour session seem like an overnight.

Great topic. I agree with the consensus here. When the chemistry is right, a double session is a great experience for all involved. I've found that when role play is involved, double sessions really rock. One of my clients loved 2 hour spy role play scenarios with two doms. I usually didn't accept scripted sessions. But, his requests were so much fun that I couldn't turn them down. Jean Bardot and I had a blast with this client whenever she was in town. Chemistry between everyone was key. Without that, it would have been as much fun as a wet blanket.

While the idea of a double interests me I agree with Nomasks on this. I think when it comes down to it I'd rather put the additional funds towards an longer session a well established Domme offering a extensive facility with tons of gear.

I like the intimacy of a one on one. For the extra money, I'd prefer to use it toward my next session.