When I session, it is all about the Domme. It is arousing to submit to a beautiful lady who is showing off a heavenly body that I know is off limits to touch. The casual nudity on her part is a turn on. Is she teasing me or is simply unaware of her beauty? I took a Domme to Key West a few years ago. She causally changed her clothes in front of me. It was humbling. It put me in complete slave mode to know that she didn't even consider I would make an advance. I can see naked women any time I want. It was the head game, intentional or not, that had me going. Nudity, on my Domme's part, is not something I would request. It doesn't matter if it happens at all. It usually doesn't. But, it is an unexpected head trip when it does.

Interesting. It's just the opposite for me. Fetish wear that covers is far more of a turn on. I when a Domme is covered and her charms, while hinted at, are off limits. Something like a catsuit with gloves and boots makes me weak in the knees.

Don't get me wrong. I like it all. Nudity is not something I would ask for. It is the attitude about it gets me going on the rare occasion that it happens. It is as if I'm incidental. Catsuits and boots are hot too.

When I am bottoming to a woman, I roll with the flow. Once I submit to a top that I trust, it is Her scene. Nudity can be powerful with the right attitude. With the right top, so could almost any type of attire.

I would not have felt comfortable doing sessions nude or even partially so. But, everyone has a different style. ClubDom has shot videos in which women are showing their lady parts while wearing boots and fetish gear. With the right ladies and the right scene, it is a hot and powerful look. But, nudity for the sake of a peep show...nah. That would be a turn off. I like that you are so flexible in going with the wave your mistress wants to ride. It makes for a better session.

I might be one who paid closer attention to Club Dom than most. Besides if I have any interest in a mistress I try to see her evolution in time from all the sources I get. Also becoming a mistress is a process that takes time and many start as models.

After this long preamble I can say that my impression was that many mistresses in training so to say (I am aware it was not a dungeon) started more as second in session at Club Dom, more like eye candy.

Some of them turned in accomplished mistresses. For instance my impression was that Megan had at some point all the skills of a mistress but was still considered a model.

On the other side Esmi played in so many videos that she did acquire skills but probably considered porn more financially rewarding than BDSM.

You are spot on. We've shot with a lot of already established and amazing doms. But, some began as models. It was fun to see the light in their eyes as they fell in love with femdom and came into their own. Megan, to this day, is a close friend. She and her family often spend holidays with mine. She was a natural. Esmi, I totally loved. She was such a dollbaby who loved everything kink. She was eager to learn. She moved to California some years ago and we lost touch. I hope she is doing well.

Bart, of Siren Productions, is standing in for ClubDom's production manger for a little while. This weekend he is filming Goddess Rainy. I met Rainy last summer when Bart and friends came for a visit at my lake house. Rainy is so cool. She is really rocking it with sessions. She is somewhat new to filming. My bet is that she will be a natural. Mistress Alana will be filming with them. You may remember her from her and Deanna Storms epic outdoor shoots. Another one of Bart's friend who came to visit is young, beautiful and loves kink. I was completely charmed with her. I am not sure what name she will be filming under. Bart and I have very different ways when it comes to camera work. But, we are totally on par with awesome people and enjoyment of femdom. I'm hoping the shoots we'll be doing together over the next few months will turn out footage that is amazing as the fun everyone will be having on set.

I 100% pick up what you're saying -- she's casually naked, and whether it's a conscious tease, or that she's so above you that she doesn't care (the way you don't mind going to the bathroom in front of your puppy, say), it's a rush. Ironically, I also get the opposite rush: she's dressed, I'm naked, what a fun emphasis on the power dynamics.

Where I diverge from you is that I strongly prefer to see my domme naked, and always ask for it. Of course, this is pro domination so there's ways to communicate limits, so I frame it as an interest thing, something along the lines of: "I welcome you to disrobe to the most you are comfortable with. 100% your choice and no expectations from me, but you are definitely free to get as naked as you'd like or stay as dressed as you'd like."

Not all subs welcome a pro domme to get naked, or want the opportunity to touch her, or to orgasm. As a result, my philosophy is, if I'd like any of those things, I should clearly express them -- as respectfully stated interests, not demands. The first two I just express as being 100% her choice and I'm just inviting her to explore to whatever extent she'd like; the last (me orgasming) is a requirement and I'd not take a session with a pro domme who denied it.

To reply to myself! I should add that obviously, if a domme's profile says she doesn't work naked, I wouldn't ask for it. I'm not a boundary pusher, but if there's ambiguity, I bias towards letting the domme know what I prefer, but recognize that she is the final decision maker

Thanks for your response. I saw your other one too. I am of the same mind that I would never ask for it, especially if it is listed as one of her restrictions. If a Domme offered it for additional money, it would be a turn off. It is the whole unexpected head fuck when it occurs that gets me going.