House of Servitude
New Lobby Posts
What would you do? Cancel the session?
by Aztoilet
11/22/24 03:05 PM
Bluesky Connections
by Lady Bellatrix
11/21/24 01:57 AM
Moving Tweets From X To BlueSky
by Soapy
11/19/24 07:09 AM
X will now allow 3rd parties to use/train A.I. on your content
by Domina M
11/18/24 06:23 AM
French newspaper of record LeMonde takes deep dive into bdsm
by Domina M
11/17/24 02:25 PM
Pain in Plein-air
by gilcarnovsky
11/17/24 10:54 AM
Humblers
by furfan
11/16/24 06:21 AM
Sites for lifestyle connections?
by Mistress Tissa
11/16/24 12:03 AM
X.com Now Lets Those You Blocked See Your Tweets
by Soapy
11/15/24 02:17 PM
Locked Out of Yahoo Email
by Soapy
11/15/24 02:16 PM
New Reviews
House of Servitude
by gilcarnovsky
11/04/24 03:09 PM
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#15724 - 08/19/21 10:18 PM OnlyFans bans NSFW content
AspX Online   content
Sage

Registered: 07/08/16
Posts: 1058
Loc: Detroit
In what is a continual story facing sex workers in general and Pro Dommes in particular, Onlyfans (a platform that only exists because of the people they're dumping) has announced they will be banning any sexually explicit material beyond just nudes beginning sometime in September.

As we all know from all the other platforms that do this kind of shit, BDSM content will probably fall under the ban even if there is no nudity involved. Meaning all the Pro Dommes who have worked their asses off creating and uploading content to this platform (as well as actively promoting it as a platform to the point that it now has 2.5 billion dollars in revenue per year), will be out on the street.... AGAIN!!! For all our bitching about Twitter, it only makes it difficult to find content but doesn't truly ban it.

AVNStars.com, a platform built BY the porn industry, is the best & safest alternative for Pro Dommes to move to, although I am sure that it will be a shitload of work for Dommes to build those new pages and rebuild a subscriber base.

Reuters News Article

Inputmag Article
_________________________
Asp


Top
#15726 - 08/20/21 08:49 AM Re: OnlyFans bans NSFW content [Re: ]
AspX Online   content
Sage

Registered: 07/08/16
Posts: 1058
Loc: Detroit
Originally Posted By Nomasks
My man, I will help shed light on what is really taking place here.


I'm sorry... I can't even begin to follow what you are talking about. It sounds like you are making some prediction of what women who really aren't doing sexual content now are going to do in the future (including female athletes turning to prostitution) rather than "what is really taking place here" in relation to OnlyFans (OF).

Presupposing that you are correct about what "these women" would do if they don't have online sexual platforms to make money, nature abhors a vacuum & the free market still rules when it comes to where money can be made. OF is not the be all/end all of online sexual platforms.

There are already established competing monthly subscription services, like AVNStars, for those getting kicked off of OF. There are still pay-per-clip stores. There are still online platforms to do live sexual content streaming and personal shows. Most importantly, there is a shitload of money to be made by platforms supporting these activities... Which means more of them are on the way.

The point of my post (and why it was posted in the lobby) was that our Dommes, who have expended time/money/effort on building their OF presence are about to get screwed by an online platform changing it's policies (again... Just look at Instagram, Twitter or Tumblr as past examples). This just means a lot more work for them related to migrating to a new platform rather than them not having alternatives.

OF doing this is not the digital equivalent of Backpage getting shut down (in conjunction with Sesta/Fosta) with nothing to take it's place. Instead, it's the equivalent of Craigslist changing it's policies so that Backpage could rise up to take its place.

_________________________
Asp


Top
#15728 - 08/20/21 11:05 AM Re: OnlyFans bans NSFW content [Re: AspX]
Mistress Ayn Online   content

Veteran

Registered: 10/13/15
Posts: 1318
Loc: Romania
My best guess with OF is that it is a credit card issue. I got notification from C4S a few weeks ago that effective Sept 1st, all uploads had to be accompanied with full compliance details (copy of id for all models in the clip, form 2257, etc) for EACH upload - meaning they would effectively be the record holder for all accounts. This is huge - and very onerous for everyone. If OF is faced with the same requirement they may not be able to be in full compliance by the bank deadline so their best option is to try to be a non-explicit site. Whether they will make it or not, who knows?

I saw issues with OF from the beginning, which is why I established myself early on AVN. So far I haven't had that issue over there.

OF has to date not sent me any notice about content restrictions. I had to read it in a news article like everyone else.
_________________________
Making grown men cry . . . and loving every minute of it.

Main website: www.mistressayn.com
Content site: www.aynrules.com
Follow Me on Twitter - @MistressAyn

Top
#15730 - 08/20/21 02:44 PM Re: OnlyFans bans NSFW content [Re: AspX]
AspX Online   content
Sage

Registered: 07/08/16
Posts: 1058
Loc: Detroit
Was hoping Soapy would repost his stuff from MF but I will do it for him...

OnlyFans will prohibit sexually explicit content starting in October

The livestreaming site is adjusting its standards to prohibit sexual acts on camera, while still permitting nudity.


https://www.cnet.com/news/onlyfans-will-prohibit-sexually-explicit-content-starting-in-october/

Quote:
The London-based livestreaming website OnlyFans will begin prohibiting sexually explicit content starting in October, the company said Thursday. The new standards will still permit nudity, provided that creators post in accordance with the site's acceptable use policy.

"Effective 1 October, 2021, OnlyFans will prohibit the posting of any content containing sexually explicit conduct," an OnlyFans spokesperson told CNET. "In order to ensure the long-term sustainability of the platform, and to continue to host an inclusive community of creators and fans, we must evolve our content guidelines."

The change is being made at the request of the site's banking partners and payout providers, the spokesperson added.

Founded in 2016, OnlyFans claims over 130 million users and 2 million creators worldwide, but recent reports suggest that the site's status as a popular destination for amateur adult content has made it difficult to attract investors. Earlier this week, the company launched a nude-less app to help broaden its image as a platform for creators and to align with the policies of popular app marketplaces.

"We will be sharing more details in the coming days and we will actively support and guide our creators through this change in content guidelines," the OnlyFans spokesperson said.

Fight for the Future, an advocacy group for online digital rights and censorship, released a statement in response.

"OnlyFans deplatforming legal sex work is a perfect example of why we need an Internet with less choke-points for censorship," said Lia Holland, Fight for the Future's Campaigns & Communications Director. "Banning sexual content from OnlyFans is not going to make anyone safer—in fact, it will put sex workers in harm's way by eliminating a safer revenue stream for a lot of marginalized folks.

"It is laughable that OnlyFan would call this an "inclusive" move when it literally excludes the primary marginalized community that has been using their services to generate safer, sustainable income since its inception."

Emily van der Nagel, a lecturer at Monash University and co-author of Sex and Social Media, believes the move is a mistake on the part of OnlyFans.

"OnlyFans has missed an opportunity to support sex workers and porn performers by formally welcoming them and proactively working with payment companies that allow adult content," she said, adding that it added further stigma to sex work. "Such a message is harmful for these vulnerable workers, and exacerbates existing harm done by other platforms deciding adult content is too risky to support."

Sex workers and those potentially impacted by the move are holding out hope restrictions don't include them. Many are frustrated that OnlyFans is seemingly set to abandon the sex workers that helped build the platform. Jenna Love, a sex worker and member of the Scarlet Alliance -- an association working towards sex workers rights -- says OnlyFans' decision is unsurprising.

"There is a lot of conflicting information circling at the moment," she said, "but we have seen OnlyFans attempts at becoming more 'mainstream' for a long time. Unfortunately banks and payment processors hold the power in this world and financial discrimination against the sex industry is absolutely rife. While we don't know exactly what this information means for content creators yet, this has the potential to be the latest in a long line of devastating blows to the sex working community."

"The news is not in any way surprising but that doesn't lessen the pain it will cause and the impact it will have on the livelihood of a lot of people," Love said. "But sex workers are a resilient bunch, we are used to adapting to dangerous legislation and discriminatory rules and we will continue to survive and thrive."
_________________________
Asp


Top
#15731 - 08/20/21 02:52 PM Re: OnlyFans bans NSFW content [Re: Mistress Ayn]
AspX Online   content
Sage

Registered: 07/08/16
Posts: 1058
Loc: Detroit
From what I have been reading it is in response to a change in policy by Mastercard that actually guess into effect in October. Although other articles say it is about getting financing from institutions so investors could cash out some of the valuation but failing to do so because of "porn".
_________________________
Asp


Top
#15733 - 08/20/21 03:48 PM Re: OnlyFans bans NSFW content - Good ridance [Re: Mistress Ayn]
Komodo Online   content
Addict

Registered: 07/12/19
Posts: 430
I was never a fan of OF which had policy and technology issues, but occasionally had to use it because of lack of alternatives.

Unfortunately C4s change in policy is IMHO a much bigger issue, and I noticed studios, some of which I liked, withdrawing because of these changes in policy.

The intrusion of the payment systems had a very negative impact on content through the years. Unfortunately there is a sustained assault on our privacy from the financial system.

Banks generate a SAR when we spend over $10,000 and some of them are getting obnoxious for considerably smaller amounts. I had to close HSBC which was getting too nosy. Credit cards try to dictate what we can and cannot buy. Cryptos which can provide privacy are knee caped.

There is an ongoing fight between the desire for privacy and the state desire to control. So far this is a fight we are losing. The changing attitudes towards privacy often sacrificed for the sake of convenience do not give reasons for optimism for the future.

Top
#15734 - 08/20/21 06:20 PM Update [Re: AspX]
AspX Online   content
Sage

Registered: 07/08/16
Posts: 1058
Loc: Detroit
No new adult content may be uploaded after Oct 1st.

All adult content must be removed by December 1st.
_________________________
Asp


Top
#15735 - 08/20/21 06:51 PM Re: Update [Re: AspX]
Mistress Ayn Online   content

Veteran

Registered: 10/13/15
Posts: 1318
Loc: Romania
They just sent the following email about an hour ago.

Dear OnlyFans Creator,

This email is to notify you of changes to our Acceptable Use Policy that will go live effective October 1, 2021.

The new policy will prohibit the posting of any new content containing sexually-explicit conduct. Content containing nudity will continue to be allowed as long as it is consistent with the policy.

Existing content that does not meet the standards of the new policy will need to be removed before December 1, 2021.

Our intention is for the policy to be implemented in accordance with the above dates, but we may need to change one or more of the dates as circumstances may require.

Here is a link to the new Acceptable Use Policy – https://www.onlyfans.com/aup

Why did the policy have to change?

Due to the size and rapid growth of the OnlyFans platform, where creators have earned over $5 billion dollars since inception, we must increasingly rely on large banking institutions and payment processors to facilitate payments between fans and creators. The new rules are necessary to comply with the requirements of these financial institutions and are the only way to help ensure the long-term sustainability of OnlyFans.

OnlyFans was founded as a diverse and inclusive home for all content creators and we stand by our commitment to that mission. We will continue to support and guide all creators through these necessary changes, making sure that all creators have a home on our platform.

We look forward to continuing to provide an innovative platform for our diverse creator community.

Thank you,
OnlyFans Team
_________________________
Making grown men cry . . . and loving every minute of it.

Main website: www.mistressayn.com
Content site: www.aynrules.com
Follow Me on Twitter - @MistressAyn

Top
#15737 - 08/20/21 07:25 PM Re: Update [Re: Mistress Ayn]
The Thomas Online   content
Addict

Registered: 10/20/15
Posts: 448
Mistress Ayn,

Thanks for posting this. This thread has been very informative.

Top
#15740 - 08/21/21 07:05 AM Re: OnlyFans bans NSFW content [Re: AspX]
ryancbtbb Offline
Occasional

Registered: 06/06/20
Posts: 35
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-57255983.amp

British Broadcasting Company reports.

Quote:
Under-18s have used fake identification to set up accounts, and police say a 14-year-old used a grandmother's passport.

The UK's most senior police officer for child protection also says children are being "exploited" on the platform.

OnlyFans says its age verification systems go over and above regulatory requirements.


The original goal was to remove teenagers from posting nudes and ESPECIALLY sex... The pressure was from outside their office, not inside their office.

If teens posted themselves with nudes when I was younger, why wouldn't it happen today? I predicted it to happen, but most people wouldn't want to hear it...

I knew teens who pursued adults (successful or unsuccessful). Few girls I had class with would masturbate during class lecture, hands in pants, then purposely shake hands with the teacher she likes. How about girls who gave handjobs to peer-group boys for small favors? The allure of making $8000 a month on onlyfans for a high school student is tempting. And the fact some would openly talk about wishing to sleep with adult men.

I heard of teen boys bragging of filming with women dommes on clip4sale studiosm, for free! If the gimped model stay hard longer than normal during ballbusting or their skin are smoother and vibrant than average. Report/flag that video for review. The fact they're boys, got more freedom because society often look the other way. The "personal responsibility don't blame others for your actions" response does give boys more freedom for certain things.. Instead of shutting down the company/website, its viewers responsibility to flag it.. And the boy's responsibility to stop lying about his age. If you randomly browsing through xnxx.com, scrolling through - you sometimes get MILF+boy or mature+boy thumbnails that look too young, makes you think "this can't be right" worse are the excited faces like he hit jackpot. It's a public site open to everyone, so its easier to flag those videos.

Websites should let viewers flag a video for inappropriate content, instead of changing the whole system.

I flashed (taunting for a ballbusting) a camp counselor/vice warden in the shower area before high school. Adults have a deluded perspective of teens.

Of course this would happen.... If OnlyFans are investigated, why didn't they target Clips4Sale? It sounds fishy.


Edited by ryancbtbb (08/21/21 07:52 AM)

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Shout Box

Who's Online
173 registered (Aztoilet, AspX, Soapy, furfan, denali, Bruce88, Domina M, shanghaimistress, Chogal, Stern Miss Lea, Chi61, MizzDom, same62, Mistress Tissa, The Thomas, nysubjack, WestAugust, Moth to a Flame, langerr, Mistrix Violeta, buffalo, Kevin, Chuck123, Smiley, Cheyenne, Lady Bellatrix, Frankfrank, EvedLeNashim, junglebeast, DeanChase, T-bone, bootboy, broom, DominaAdmin, GoddessCapri, palmer, Boucheron, Lady Paradise, Oliver Cromwell, DommeLynx, ilyaserdyukov, MayaMidnight, marstoy, MsRoseWoods, JosephG, midlet, Goddess ISJ, Chamberpot, Itsme, gilcarnovsky, simethiconevortex, CelesteTaylor, gfred1, Stephen M, tosser, Queen Naomi, artiemus1, Farandaway, FineDiner, milagros317, MistressIsadora, sfotk1, Mistress Ayn, Sublime2199, Patrick19103, Ashley Paige, Poester, uno, arydia, frank, Mistress Mickey, ztrade, Miss Nyxon, Mistress Berlin NYC, painslut, AaronGrant, Dr. Pleasure, TheDriver, quietman, Mistress UV, jlars555, Lady Velvet Steel, PASubMale, mtsub69, Maxjr, sellinggr, Curiouser, Madam Jess, Esrwasrse, subspace, Scroll & Key, schrads, Slv4u, international, Fred rosen, Stone23, Bruxelles, Mick681, porkster, kefxb24, Madame Keiko, MistressMaraM, DominaMiranda, guillermopelotas, Violetwand, bondagelover, Andrew, Kwd, Domina Perpetua, need to serve, So long, Ms_Gia_Peccato, Marcus, crueloriental, Loyal Ass slave, ElenaDeLuca, Drifter, itsover, Miss Paz Bizarre, Komodo, Condor, jcs, Tomew, mark5Bnyc, sg22, JensTFace, Smartjohnny, SamBorn, Doc Domina, bdsmlover, Georgia Payne, slave47, subM, gboy, Humbaramba, Cristom, seahunt, Jeff B, Jupiter Lake, Browniepoints95, Vlu, coffe, Awillingstudent, Crucificado, Bound ashtray Man, evalstoevres, Ms Regan Black, NewUserSub, Par Ticklish, acquiesced, isuffr4her, Kinkystylz, Gagged2, NycMistressDevi, subwrestler, truesubtipp, LaundryService, davidi, S2stoiletslave, Phunter277, Marked0ne, betadog, Gs8483, bbwlover4ever, kinkybootbeast, DougCooper, SissySub, SuccessfulGuy, spankedjester, KinkyBoston, jadreg13, Oeste13, Naughtyboi1981), 14963 Guests and 85 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
November
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Mistress Jada Sinn