There is a site on porbhub that, while shooting only with people who are over 21, is based on the fantasy of incest. Their content would never be permitted on a traditional membership website. The incest and sex acts involving "Minors" is only implied. But that would be banned by most other popular VOD sites. The store owner is making a ton of movie. I'd guess around 500k a year, just his cut. So, he's been granted leniency with Porn Hub. The owner is a model who used to shoot for ClubDom. He's actually a nice person. For years, other producers, who knew him when he was a model, have been warning him to appreciate his good fortune start producing content that doesn't put him in a situation to have the rug pulled out from under his feet or, worse yet, land him in jail.

When I opened the article to see the headline, he went through my mind. Does anyone remember the site InSex.com? They were a femsub extreme torture site. The torture was real. It was incredibly disturbing. They must have seen the warning signs, sold the site and got out of dodge eventually. Porn Hub must be seeing some type of writing on the wall, be it another Attorney General attack on porn, like we experienced in the Bush admin, or a crack down from their merchants. Porn hub has long forbid real Sm scenes...even a typical whipping scene. This would probably be a good time for video producers, pushing the envelope, to tone it down and look for other niches.

I don't approve of the implied incest or Ted Bundy looking videos. But, when they come after people for far less than Hollywood puts out, it is beyond wrong. Someone mentioned here that no legislator would defend the adult industry. That is lousy...especially when shows like American Horror Story can produce a show in which Lady Ga Ga and her boyfriend play sadistic vampires who lure a vanilla couple in for a threesome, have sex with them and then, in the midst of ecstasy, devour them in a bloody and horrific manner. If you or I made a video like that, not only would not be permitted to show it but, we'd run a risk of legal issues.