Originally Posted By future pet
Fair enough. My only point was to distinguish between someone who is truly malevolent and should be shown the door (a misogynist) and someone who is simply a nitwit. Rudy is firmly in the latter camp.

In any case I'm getting all the drama I need these days and don't seek it here.


The issue is who gets to decide what the threshold is when someone goes from "nitwit" to "malevolent"?

If a guy is posting misogynistic things, he's malevolent because hating women *is* malevolence. I mean, what you would say constitutes malevolence if not that?